Effective Cubic Coupling Between Modes? #311
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Options to printing out the anharmonic coupling coefficients are already implemented in ALAMODE, albeit not supported officially. Please add the following options with In The first row defines the number of target modes, and the following 15 lines specify (qx, qy, qz) and the branch index (1-base). After the The last two float values are real and imaginary parts of the coupling coefficient. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I would like to compute a quantity that can measure the (cubic) coupling between modes (I'm interested in$\Gamma$ -point modes only), having already obtained the third-order force constants (FC3) and phonon eigenvectors. Something like:
Where:
is the FC3 tensor (from .fcs file), and:
is the FC3 multiplicity tensor (also from .fcs file), and:
is a (normalized) phonon eigenvector at the$\Gamma$ -point (from .evec file). $(\nu,\lambda,\sigma)$ index phonon branches, $(\alpha,\beta,\gamma)$ index atoms and $(i,j,k)$ index Cartesian directions.
Or perhaps it is more appropriate to use this, which accounts for the frequency/mass factors in the mode length scale:
Both approaches are essentially projecting the (Cartesian) FC3 tensor onto the normal modes. The hope is that modes with 'strong cubic coupling' will have a large A value, whereas 'weakly cubic coupled' modes will not. Of course, this can be extended to higher orders (FC4, etc).
I am certain that this will have been discussed in the literature, but I cannot find a rigorous definition, and am uncertain about the mass/frequency factors. The idea is to investigate which modes could potentially contribute to third-harmonic generation.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions