Skip to content

Clean up h/g/p wording#5341

Open
beckykd wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
bd-hub-groups
Open

Clean up h/g/p wording#5341
beckykd wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
bd-hub-groups

Conversation

@beckykd

@beckykd beckykd commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@beckykd beckykd marked this pull request as ready for review July 7, 2026 21:10
@beckykd beckykd requested a review from a team July 7, 2026 21:10
@qiskit-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

One or more of the following people are relevant to this code:

  • @abbycross
  • @beckykd

@beckykd beckykd requested a review from francabrera July 7, 2026 21:10
abbycross
abbycross previously approved these changes Jul 8, 2026

@abbycross abbycross left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Comment thread docs/guides/considerations-set-up-runtime.mdx Outdated

@Eric-Arellano Eric-Arellano left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems like a huge improvement to me. I would have been a lot less confused. Thanks for working on this!

Might need sign-off from Fran

# Considerations for setting up IBM Quantum Platform for an organization

In an organization where individuals might work on several projects, IBM Quantum Platform governance can seem complex. However, access management can be used to easily enable user collaboration and to restrict visibility of users and projects when necessary. Managing access becomes more relevant with IBM Quantum Platform resources that are not free - that is, service instances that use paid plans (which organizations are charged for).
In an organization where individuals might work on several projects, IBM Quantum Platform governance can seem complex. However, access management can be used to easily enable user collaboration and to restrict visibility of users and projects when necessary. Managing access becomes more relevant with IBM Quantum Platform resources that are not free - that is, service instances that use paid plans (which organizations are charged for). In this guide it is assumed that you set up a separate instance for each internal project.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
In an organization where individuals might work on several projects, IBM Quantum Platform governance can seem complex. However, access management can be used to easily enable user collaboration and to restrict visibility of users and projects when necessary. Managing access becomes more relevant with IBM Quantum Platform resources that are not free - that is, service instances that use paid plans (which organizations are charged for). In this guide it is assumed that you set up a separate instance for each internal project.
In an organization where individuals might work on several projects, IBM Quantum Platform governance can seem complex. However, access management can be used to easily enable user collaboration and to restrict visibility of users and projects when necessary. Managing access becomes more relevant with IBM Quantum Platform resources that are not free - that is, service instances that use paid plans (which organizations are charged for). In this guide, it is assumed that you set up a separate instance for each project.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Idk if we should hedge with something like ", which is only one possible way to set up instances."

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Confusing reference to hub groups?

4 participants