Skip to content

109 implement conjugated portdefinitionextensions#320

Open
TanaseMariusatstarion wants to merge 3 commits into
developmentfrom
109-implement-conjugated-portdefinitionextensions
Open

109 implement conjugated portdefinitionextensions#320
TanaseMariusatstarion wants to merge 3 commits into
developmentfrom
109-implement-conjugated-portdefinitionextensions

Conversation

@TanaseMariusatstarion

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Prerequisites

  • I have written a descriptive pull-request title
  • I have verified that there are no overlapping pull-requests open
  • I have verified that I am following the SysML2.NET code style guidelines
  • I have provided test coverage for my change (where applicable)

Description

Fixed #109 implementation of ConjugatedPortDefinition extensions

@lxatstariongroup lxatstariongroup left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please implement Sonarqube's suggestions

Comment thread SysML2.NET/Extend/ConjugatedPortDefinitionExtensions.cs
Comment thread SysML2.NET/Extend/ConjugatedPortDefinitionExtensions.cs
Comment thread SysML2.NET/Extend/ConjugatedPortDefinitionExtensions.cs
@TanaseMariusatstarion TanaseMariusatstarion force-pushed the 109-implement-conjugated-portdefinitionextensions branch from 36760b9 to bfc13d1 Compare July 3, 2026 12:47
@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature]: Implement ConjugatedPortDefinitionExtensions

2 participants