Skip to content

Waterbody bug fix#1077

Open
kapildadheech wants to merge 2 commits into
devfrom
features/waterbody_fix
Open

Waterbody bug fix#1077
kapildadheech wants to merge 2 commits into
devfrom
features/waterbody_fix

Conversation

@kapildadheech

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@amanodt Please review and merge. Changes are already in production due to some urgency

gee_account_id=None,
proj_id=None,
start_date="2017-07-01",
end_date="2025-06-30",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should avoid such hard-coding as they are relevant for one year only and we will have to make changes next year again. We should rather restrict the flow if correct parameters are not provided.

start_date="2017-07-01",
end_date="2025-06-30",
start_year=2017,
end_year=2024,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should avoid such hard-coding as they are relevant for one year only and we will have to make changes next year again. We should rather restrict the flow if correct parameters are not provided.

start_date="2017-07-01",
end_date="2025-06-30",
start_year=2017,
end_year=2024,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should avoid such hard-coding as they are relevant for one year only and we will have to make changes next year again. We should rather restrict the flow if correct parameters are not provided.

asset_suffix=None,
asset_folder_list=None,
start_date="2017-07-01",
end_date="2025-06-30",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should avoid such hard-coding as they are relevant for one year only and we will have to make changes next year again. We should rather restrict the flow if correct parameters are not provided.

@amanodt amanodt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please resolve my comments.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants